Recently, one of my athletes asked me to explain how to effectively structure a training programme, which, as it turns out, is a more common question than one might think. Coaches get asked about programme design in various ways all the time—sometimes as a direct question, other times more indirectly. While it might seem like creating a training plan is as simple as throwing a few workouts together, successful programme planning involves much more. A well-designed training programme has structure, clear goals, and phases that target specific adaptations to help athletes achieve their peak performance on race day. This is the art of program planning.
In this article, I’ll dive into the key principles behind programme planning: progressive overload, training cycles, and the importance of recovery. I’ll also discuss the different phases of an endurance training programme, from building a base to sharpening race-specific skills. Whether you’re training for a shorter race such as a half marathon or a longer one like an ultramarathon, understanding these concepts will help you reach your peak potential while avoiding common pitfalls like overreaching or overtraining.
Why Structure is Key
Programme planning is more than simply alternating between easy and hard workouts. The structure must be purposeful, guiding athletes through different phases to achieve specific physiological adaptations. Each workout should have a goal, whether it’s building endurance, improving speed, or enhancing recovery.
The concept of progressive overload is essential here. This principle involves gradually increasing the difficulty or intensity of training to stress the body in different ways. This stress stimulates the body to adapt and become stronger. However, it’s not a linear process. Proper programme planning incorporates periods of increased training load (overload), followed by recovery phases where the body repairs itself and absorbs the training. Without a structured plan, athletes risk entering a state of overreaching (where fatigue temporarily surpasses recovery) or, worse, overtraining (where the body is chronically fatigued and performance declines).
The Phases of a Programme: Macrocycle, Mesocycle, Microcycle
To understand how a structured programme works, it helps to think of training as being organised into cycles:
- Macrocycle: This is the big-picture plan, often spanning several months, or even years for elite athletes. For endurance athletes, this cycle typically ends with a key race or competition. The macrocycle includes all the phases of training needed to peak for that event.
- Mesocycle: These are smaller blocks within the macrocycle, typically lasting 3-6 weeks. Each mesocycle focuses on a specific training goal, such as building a base, increasing VO2 max, improving lactate threshold, or working on endurance. Different mesocycles prepare the athlete for the next stage of training while preventing burnout.
- Microcycle: These are the shortest training cycles, usually lasting one week. A microcycle will contain a mix of workouts—hard sessions, recovery runs, and rest days—targeted to fit the overall goal of the mesocycle.
Together, these cycles form a roadmap that guides athletes through the various stages of training, from general fitness to competition.
Building a Training Base and Progressing Through Phases
Endurance training typically progresses from general to specific. At the beginning of a training programme, the focus is on building a solid aerobic base. This involves running at lower intensities to improve the cardiovascular system’s efficiency and get the body used to the volume. A well-developed aerobic base provides the foundation for more intense training later in the programme.
As the athlete progresses, the focus shifts to VO2 max and lactate threshold training—workouts designed to increase oxygen utilisation and delay fatigue caused by lactate buildup. This phase includes shorter intervals progressing to longer intervals, tempo runs, and controlled faster paces, helping the athlete run faster for longer periods.
Finally, the programme becomes more race-specific in the endurance phase. This phase often mimics race conditions, such as long runs with sections at race pace, night runs for ultramarathons, hill training to simulate elevation gain, and practising nutrition strategies. This specificity is crucial because it prepares the athlete not just physically, but also mentally, for the challenges they will face on race day. The principle of “nothing new on race day” holds true here—practising under conditions that mimic race day as closely as possible reduces surprises and builds confidence.
ADVERTISEMENT
Avoiding Overreaching and Overtraining
One of the biggest challenges in endurance training is finding the right balance between pushing the body to improve and allowing enough recovery to avoid overreaching or overtraining. Overreaching is a temporary state where fatigue surpasses the body’s ability to recover quickly. While it’s a necessary part of training, if not managed well, it can turn into overtraining, a more serious, long-term condition where the body’s performance declines due to chronic stress and inadequate recovery. This affects the overall health of the athlete and can lead to serious conditions. Moreover, after reaching a state of overtraining, the athlete has an increased risk of falling into overtraining again in the future.
To avoid this, programme planning must incorporate recovery phases. These are periods where the training load is reduced, giving the body time to repair and rebuild. This recovery is what allows the athlete to convert accumulated fatigue into improved performance (known as “super-compensation”). Without proper recovery, the athlete risks not just overtraining, but also injury and burnout.
Final Thoughts
Endurance training is both an art and a science. A well-structured programme doesn’t just push athletes to work harder; it guides them through specific phases that target different physiological adaptations. Progressive overload is balanced with recovery, and training cycles are designed to ensure athletes peak at the right time.
Ultimately, programme planning should take into account the individual needs of each athlete. The more specific the training becomes, the more targeted to race conditions should be. However, weaknesses should be worked from very early in the program. By following a structured, progressive approach, athletes can avoid overreaching and overtraining, while giving themselves the best chance of success on race day. This is the art of program planning.
ADVERTISEMENT